I beg to differ with Wed. Journal’s esteemed features editor, Ken Trainor, in the matter of “cuckold.” First, how old is the word as for being available for use today? Answer: it’s current. It’s not obsolete, that is, and won’t be as long as male adulterers festoon our land.
(Adultery is expensive, concluded the very young but highly literate Edith Wharton, on reading the ferry boat sign, “Adults 50 cents, Children 25 cents.”)
However, Ken T. gives time in his latest column to the meaning “cuckold” has acquired in a sexual underground: some sort of kinky sex. Not necessary: neither John Hubbuch nor the objectors to his column had this in mind — though it did occur to a Wed. Jnl co-worker. Hmmm.
In fact, as recently as last September “The Magnificent Cuckold,” billed as “the astonishing classic farce (“Le Cocu magnifique”), written in 1920 by the Franco-Belgian playwright Fernand Crommelynck,” was presented at the Connelly Theater, on East 4th Street (between Avenues A & B), in New York City.
No need was determined in this announcement to specify that the sexual-underground meaning was not intended.
BTW, personal to Ken: you made the right choice in running the Hubbuch column as is. BTW 2, where the heck is this column of yours on the WJ site?