Archive for February, 2008

A point of emphasis

I beg to differ with Wed. Journal’s esteemed features editor, Ken Trainor, in the matter of “cuckold.”  First, how old is the word as for being available for use today?  Answer: it’s current.  It’s not obsolete, that is, and won’t be as long as male adulterers festoon our land. 

(Adultery is expensive, concluded the very young but highly literate Edith Wharton, on reading the ferry boat sign, “Adults 50 cents, Children 25 cents.”)

However, Ken T. gives time in his latest column to the meaning “cuckold” has acquired in a sexual underground: some sort of kinky sex.  Not necessary: neither John Hubbuch nor the objectors to his column had this in mind — though it did occur to a Wed. Jnl co-worker.  Hmmm.

In fact, as recently as last September “The Magnificent Cuckold,” billed as “the astonishing classic farce (“Le Cocu magnifique”), written in 1920 by the Franco-Belgian playwright Fernand Crommelynck,” was presented at the Connelly Theater, on East 4th Street (between Avenues A & B), in New York City.

No need was determined in this announcement to specify that the sexual-underground meaning was not intended.

BTW, personal to Ken: you made the right choice in running the Hubbuch column as is.  BTW 2, where the heck is this column of yours on the WJ site?

Leave a Comment

Advice to Wednesday Journal

The fire-Hubbuch movement is under way.  Good.  Throw him and his out on the street.  It’s in this letter from an Oak Park woman whose attention he caught with a column in which he mentions Hillary as “the most famous cuckquean in American history,” explaining for the semi-literate that this is “a woman whose husband strays” from connubial obligations. 

Comments by me are in brackets:

2/26/2008
Dear Mr. Trainor,

You should have pulled this [column] or excised part of it. Remarks regarding Hillary Clinton’s qualifications for president were derogatory to all women. [Italics added]  She does have the qualifications independent of her husband.  [Matter of opinion here, but not to be excised.]

Bill Clinton was a fine president. His term of office grows in stature compared to our current president. He and John Kennedy were womanizers during their entire terms. The U.S. sees these actions as more important than George Bush’s pre-emptive war in Iraq and the destruction of the U.S. economy. [Italics added.  Don’t bother putting H. and his out on street; we are all heading there already.]

Hillary has a longer term as senator than Barack Obama. I support her, but will work for and vote for the Democratic nomination.

Hubbuch lacks intelligence and sensitivity. You have control over his employment. [Fire him]

Donna L. Cervini

It’s give and take like this that makes Oak Park great, yesssss.

Leave a Comment

Village of churches — still

Only in Oak Park did a splinter gay congregation, once part of Chicago’s Good Shepherd Metropolitan Community Church, survive:

[O]ver the years, many troubles came to plague Good Shepherd. First, the congregation repeatedly split due to ideological differences, spawning satellite MCCs, such as Christ the Redeemer in Evanston, Church of the Resurrection in Hyde Park and New Spirit in Oak Park [542 S. Scoville, 708-848-5460] — only the one in Oak Park survives today. [Italics added]

This is not surprising.  Oak Park has been a major church-oriented town from the start.  If a church can’t survive here, it can survive nowhere.

Then there are “Welcoming Gay Friendly Churches” in Oak Park:

 Ascension

Oak Park Catholic   St. Catherine of Siena-St. Lucy Oak Park Catholic   Grace Church Oak Park Episcopal   Good Shepherd Lutheran Church Oak Park Lutheran   Oak Park Mennonite Church Oak Park Mennonite   New Spirit MCC Oak Park Non-denominational   First United Church Oak Park UCC, Presbyterian   Pilgrim Church Oak Park UCC   Euclid Avenue UMC Oak Park UMC   First United Methodist Church of Oak Park Oak Park UMC

Worship at New Spirit MCC is Sundays at 11am (June through August at 10am), with Wednesday Prayer and Hymn Sing at 7:30pm.

Leave a Comment

Obama appeal

INSPIRED BY CHANGE MAYBE? — A letter writer has warmed globally to Sen. Obama as reminiscent of JFK almost 50 years ago with his stirring “Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country.” But O’s message is just the opposite, consisting entirely about what your country should do for you, though admittedly details are vague even about this.

In any case he produces no burst of generosity, as of Peace Corps commitment or embrace of national defense vs. our cold-war enemy the Soviet Union. Instead he would have us rally ‘round the flag of statism and dependence on government. He captures support by his looks and demeanor, not by any call to arms or to service, except vaguely in a Rodney King-like plea to get along.

With all respect, isn’t this the Democrat way? When Democrat candidates gathered together at the OP Library during primary season two years ago, they talked government aid, in sharp sharp contrast with Republicans a few weeks earlier, who talked job creation through entrepreneurship.

For the Dems the cause of the moment was job training by a government agency — old-time Democrat religion of government aid. For the Republicans it about tax relief and other diminutions of government activity — a far cry from asking what government can do for us.

Leave a Comment