Archive for July, 2007

Daylight assaults have neighborhood on edge

In this Wed. Journal news flash, the OP deputy chief says these assaults are not a matter of race:

“It doesn’t appear, from what we’ve seen, that race plays a part in selecting a victim,” said Scianna. “It’s the first poor soul you come across that piques your interest. The three Chicago kids were walking around and saw the man washing his car and said ‘Let’s mess with him.’”

This is meaningless, in view of the attackers’ being black (though the story does not — dare not? — say it) and the victims white.  How does he know a black victim would have been spared?  We reader-residents would like to know.

I once shouted at black kids on a Green Line train when they had gotten out of hand without attacking anyone, and a black man rose immediately to tell them to pipe down.  Said hardly anything, but spoke with authority that I as a white man did not have.  Would not these attackers rather not meet with such authority when they attack?

We have a border problem in OP, as civilized people have always had when living near uncivilized.  Highlanders used to raid northern England.  Barbarians raided the edges of the Roman Empire.  So the attackers come from Austin, looking for vulnerable white people.  Or so it seems, until someone shows us otherwise.

Leave a Comment

Prep for 8/1 Wed Jnl column on mass:

Read:

* Thomas Day, Where Have You Gone, Michelangelo? and Why Catholics Can’t Sing

* James Hitchcock, Recovery of the Sacred

* Rudolph Otto, Idea of the Holy

Read Day a few years back.  From him got realization of priest as center of attention during mass, miked, dominating the proceeedings.

Read Hitchcock recently.  He has a calm, reasoned indictment of reform since 70s, but not as indictment.  Emphasize calm and reasoned.  Wonderful book.

Am reading Otto, who gets down to the ineffable aspect of God-knowledge.  So far, 50 pp into it, and he’s clearly offering a reasonable alternative to the drily rational.  More later on him.

Leave a Comment

This woman needs help

She is Emily L. Hauser, of N. Lombard Ave, and she could use a keeper, to judge by her 7/13 piece in the Christian Science Monitor, “Feeling way too white.”  “On a recent beautiful Sunday,” she wrote, “I undertook an unusual experiment: I crossed a street.”  That street, Dear Reader, was Austin Boulevard, and what she found on the other side was a shock.

“As I stepped over the curb, I became excruciatingly aware of my skin color [white], and my heart pounded with social anxiety.”  She “got stares.”  She “was a stranger in a strange land.”

“[T]his shouldn’t be true,” she wrote.  She had sung “We Shall Overcome” at school assemblies, has had “black bosses,” has “written about Kwanzaa,” for gosh sakes.  She knows what Juneteenth is!  She has a black cousin! Glory be!

A strange land indeed, “one of Chicago’s poorest neighborhoods,” she says — she should try Lawndale or East Garfield.  It’s dangerous.  It has a “well-attended soup kitchen . . . and Austin families often visit my neighborhood to play in its parks or go trick-or-treating.  And dear heart, they beat people up in Taylor Park or Whittier school yard.

But the shooters of (hate) stares — What you doin’ here, girl? — “were from a woman in a high-end SUV and a man on a high-end motorcycle.”  So class is not the issue!  What’s left?

Meanwhile, back in Oak Park, it’s no better.  She knows black people no better over here.  She chats with them, mentioning Chris Rock or Barack Obama, but then changes the subject lest she seem overly race-conscious.  Good for her, but close call.

She’d like to ask about Condoleezza Rice and whether it’s hard for atheists among them, they being so church-oriented, and what whites get wrong about them on a regular basis — questions she’d put to a German or Pakistani, but things she has never even asked her black cousin!  If she does, the cousin has my permission to sock her.  “We’re not integrated. We’re strangers,” she moans, apparently choking back a sob.

It’s her fault.  She’s guilty of “soft racism” and for all her sappy good will is “part of the problem.”  She won’t “admit our differences.”  She’s afraid to look foolish and thus learns nothing.  Lady, I am strongly tempted to say you will never learn anything.

She should try to get over herself, she concludes.  That much at least.

Leave a Comment

This woman needs help

She is Emily L. Hauser, of N. Lombard Ave, and she could use a keeper, to judge by her 7/13 piece in the Christian Science Monitor, “Feeling way too white.”  “On a recent beautiful Sunday,” she wrote, “I undertook an unusual experiment: I crossed a street.”  That street, Dear Reader, was Austin Boulevard, and what she found on the other side was a shock.

“As I stepped over the curb, I became excruciatingly aware of my skin color [white], and my heart pounded with social anxiety.”  She “got stares.”  She “was a stranger in a strange land.”

“[T]his shouldn’t be true,” she wrote.  She had sung “We Shall Overcome” at school assemblies, has had “black bosses,” has “written about Kwanzaa,” for gosh sakes.  She knows what Juneteenth is!  She has a black cousin! Glory be!

A strange land indeed, “one of Chicago’s poorest neighborhoods,” she says — she should try Lawndale or East Garfield.  It’s dangerous.  It has a “well-attended soup kitchen . . . and Austin families often visit my neighborhood to play in its parks or go trick-or-treating.  And dear heart, they beat people up in Taylor Park or Whttier school yard.

But the shooters of (hate) stares — What you doin’ here, girl? — “were from a woman in a high-end SUV and a man on a high-end motorcycle.”  So class is not the issue!  What’s left?

Meanwhile, back in Oak Park, it’s no better.  She knows black people no better over here.  She chats with them, mentioning Chris Rock or Barack Obama, but then changes the subject lest she seem overly race-conscious.  Good for her, but close call.

She’d like to ask about Condoleezza Rice and whether it’s hard for atheists among them, they being so church-oriented, and what whites get wrong about them on a regular basis — questions she’d put to a German or Pakistani, but things she has never even asked her black cousin!  If she does, the cousin has my permission to sock her.  “We’re not integrated. We’re strangers,” she moans, apparently choking back a sob.

It’s her fault.  She’s guilty of “soft racism” and for all her sappy good will is “part of the problem.”  She won’t “admit our differences.”  She’s afraid to look foolish and thus learns nothing.  Lady, I am strongly tempted to say you will never learn anything.

She should try to get over herself, she concludes.  That much at least.

Leave a Comment