In this Wed. Journal news flash, the OP deputy chief says these assaults are not a matter of race:
“It doesn’t appear, from what we’ve seen, that race plays a part in selecting a victim,” said Scianna. “It’s the first poor soul you come across that piques your interest. The three Chicago kids were walking around and saw the man washing his car and said ‘Let’s mess with him.’”
This is meaningless, in view of the attackers’ being black (though the story does not — dare not? — say it) and the victims white. How does he know a black victim would have been spared? We reader-residents would like to know.
I once shouted at black kids on a Green Line train when they had gotten out of hand without attacking anyone, and a black man rose immediately to tell them to pipe down. Said hardly anything, but spoke with authority that I as a white man did not have. Would not these attackers rather not meet with such authority when they attack?
We have a border problem in OP, as civilized people have always had when living near uncivilized. Highlanders used to raid northern England. Barbarians raided the edges of the Roman Empire. So the attackers come from Austin, looking for vulnerable white people. Or so it seems, until someone shows us otherwise.